For longer than I’ve been a firm fan of John Prescott, I’ve been fighting against the British class system, pushing against a glass ceiling that I’ll never be allowed to break. Whatever my educational attainments, however much money I have, whoever my husband is, I’ll never quite belong to the upper middle class. Because I went to a state school. Because my parents left school at sixteen and because they did not go to university. Because they were not educated privately. Because I grew up in a modern semi-detached house on the wrong side of town. Because I went to a Polytechnic not a proper university. Because of all these things I am tattoed with my lower middle class origins and will never ever be able to cast them off. It is not any one of those reasons that defeats me, but the basket of them all. At least I am Christian, white and Anglo-Saxon. The best I can hope for is for token acceptance, as the oddity, the exotic Labour Party member in a bouquet of Tories.
I don’t know my place. I have ideas above my station, and this is where the trouble starts. I threaten those in the class above me who fear they might not be able to maintain their position in the next generation. Women are the worst, or perhaps the problem for me is worst amongst members of the same gender. I think it is because women’s success is defined more by their class than is true of men who define themselves by their jobs. Upper middle class women tend not to have jobs. Jobs are for lower middle class women and middle middle class women. People tell me that I imagine things. I don’t. I just notice things and happen to come in contact with the upper middle classes quite a lot because, as I said, I don’t know my place. I am uppity.
So a short series of TV programmes featuring Mr and Mrs Prescott cantering through the class system was always going to be unmissable. Working class John Prescott rose to be Deputy Prime Minister in the Labour government under Tony Blair and has famously smacked a member of the public who threw an egg at him, confessed to an affair and fought to keep his marriage to his glamorous working class wife, and has written and spoken about his bulimia. He describes himself as a “bag of no confidence” with enough chips to eat with fish.
The first programme deals with class amongst white Britons and takes the Prescotts from encounters with aristocrats to strawberries on the terrace at Westminster with three “chavs”, one of the few words banned in our household. Chav is shorthand for “Council house and violence” according to the most commonly advanced etymology. My daughters’ friends use it the whole time to denote girls (in particular) who dress in a particular way and just happen also to come from a different background.
John Prescott is endearing, and his wife equally so. The warm, funny, open relationship that the couple enjoy makes you smile with them: there is something chastening about watching a couple who have weathered so much and have emerged with such demonstrable love and support for each other inspite of – or as a result of – the storms, who have loved each other since they were teenagers, and who make each other laugh often. He was the man who married a woman who had given up a child for adoption. She is the woman who has stood by her man, understanding his frailties, his insecurities, and forgiving him because she understood them.
For John Prescott is familarly insecure. Even at 70 he is still hurt to remember how the Blairs never invited them to Chequers. He craves acceptance from people who will never accept him, whom he describes as The Enemy.
He talks to two public school boys at the rowing regatta at Henley-on-Thames and challenges them about their upper middle class sense of entitlement. Their badge of entitlement is a gold signet ring on their little finger, bearing the family crest. Easily visible and unmistakeable at thirty yards. It turns out that the army has bought the entitlement of one of them, a privilege reserved only for children of officers.
Watching Prescott wander along the tow path at Henley, he confirms my prejudices. Nothing he can ever do will ever allow him to leave his class behind. He will never be a member of the upper middle class and members of that class will always be able to look down on his lower social class origins. The only hope for his white, Christian, Anglo-saxon family is for them to buy into the class system, educate their children privately, and, with any luck, after three generations the working class man will have been bred out of them, much as the Australians tried breeding the black out of Aboriginees.
Self doubt cripples or fulfils an individual with a desire to prove themselves, or both, we hear. John Prescott is a complicated mixture of neuroses and principles, hating snobs with every breath of his body. He rails against snobbery and inherited privilege, against the horribly British reality that the privately educated 7% of the population occupy 80% of the top jobs. Cherie Blair, a working class woman like Paula, is still trying to win acceptance. Even being a Queen’s Counsel, a top barrister in her own right, even being married to a Prime Minister, will not help her gain entry.
Cherie Blair and Paula Prescott
I hate snobbery too and I cried as I watched the programme. Almost nothing makes me more angry, and more hurt in equal measure. I hate it that I may be as intelligent, attractive, educated as the next (upper middle) class person, but I will never be quite good enough in the eyes of many of that class or, if I am TOO good, I will need to be put firmly back in my place because my parents could not afford to buy me the proper ticket and so I have no right to be there. I cannot bear to see people, children particularly, being put down because of their social origins and find it difficult to forgive people who do it so unthinkingly. My daughters cringe when a friend says that snobbish c— word, knowing that a lecture from me will follow. And yet, and yet, I find myself steering my children towards acceptable upper middle class clothes, just as I refused to allow them to take on the young girls’ badge of the working class – pierced ears before puberty – lest they find themselves judged and found wanting by their peers.
The only solution is a title – a knighthood or a peerage – which would allow me to leapfrog over the enemy territory to a higher land, to jump from being an Untouchable to being beyond reach. I say “Take the peerage, John. You’ve earned it!”. Ironically, if he had not done so well, he would not have realised the size of the problem.
Time after time people ask him why he cannot leave his insecurity behind, why he cannot see how well he has done, how much he has achieved. But he lacks the confidence to do so, the confidence that comes from being educated at public school to know one’s own superiority and that of one’s old school friends.
We went to look round Westminster School a few weeks ago. Westminster School is possibly one of the least snobbish private schools you could hope to find. It is an anarchic beacon, an admittedly elitist meritocracy, and Elder Daughter would have loved to go there – if it wasn’t so far from our home. From the minute we arrived everyone told our daughter how brilliant she was. She may or may not be brilliant – they couldn’t possibly have known – but it doesn’t take long to start believing the messenger and behaving accordingly. Imagine a school that tells you, day after day, year after year, that you are superior to the unwashed outside the gate. You’d end up believing it, which is what your parents paid the fees for.
Private education is not all about getting a better education. Private education in boarding schools is rarely about getting a better education, but it will still increase your chances of going to a top University, and winning a top job. Eton is a notable exception to add to those London day schools, and is wealthy enough to offer generous bursaries and scholarships which, in theory at least, put it within reach of every bright boy, even funding boys through the necessary preparatory schools that feed into it. Even then, the scholarship boy may discover that he didn’t go to the same school as those whose parents paid the fees. I would love every bright boy to have an opportunity of experiencing the education that Eton offers, and every girl.
I don’t get upset by all this much nowadays and things are perhaps changing slowly. I’ve grown a thicker skin or simply an older, tougher one that I feel happier in. But there was a time when it would not have taken much to radicalise me and I still know where I’d plant the bombs if it got really bad. In my ideal world, I’d abolish private education altogether, though not the schools that provide it, and I’d replace it with something that recognises and rewards an individual child’s merit. Margaret Thatcher had a good shot at doing something similar – by providing means tested Assisted Places to private schools in areas where her beloved grammar schools had been abolished. And isn’t it a scandal that private schools still qualify for the privileged fiscal regime of charitable status – that we, the taxpayers, are subsidising this invidious system?
Nowadays I’ve given up fighting and just play the system and there are few people that have more personal, first hand knowledge of the system than me, from the very top to somewhere close to the bottom. We educate our daughters in the periphery of that detested public school system, in a cloudy nether world – occupied by worthy girls’ day schools and the rump of the old grammar schools – which straddles the border between the Haves and the Have-nots. When they are older they will be able to choose which world they want to live in, and will hopefully blend in to both. You could argue that I should not have sold out my principles, that we should have sent our children to the local state comprehensive school. I would argue that they are my principles, not my children’s; that almost nobody who can afford the private school fees comfortably chooses to send their children to state schools, so entrenched is the purchase of privilege; and that our daughers will be able to choose their principles for themselves, free of the insecurities that have dogged me.
You can watch the programme here, but only in the UK sadly. The second programme goes out on Monday, and deals with class and ethnicity…
7 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 31, 2008 at 11:59 pm
Tricia
Hello, As insightful post as ever, thank you. I agree with you on the confidence thing – my yorkshire man tells me, that being told that they were great players was behind the 4 x 4 survival of Tottehnham on Wednesday evening. However the most annoying thing is the people who don’t ever recognise the privilege that they have. This piece appeared in today’s Guardian, written by a former boss of mine, it just shows how from his lofty heights he singularly fails to understand any of the points that John Prescott is making. Is it only because of the various equality laws of the 70’s that a more meritocractic Britain begins to exist?
‘I enjoyed the first of John Prescott’s television series onclass, The Class System and Me, mainly because of its revelation of his wife Pauline as a woman of great charm, humour and good sense, but it told me almost nothing about class. If there is still a class system operating in Britain, as I assume there must be, the programme failed to identify where or how.
As is normal with programmes of this kind, it consisted of a series of contrived confrontations in which Prescott, the working-class hero, was brought into contact with supposed toffs or, in the case of three teenage “chav” girls in Lewisham in south-east London, with people he might regard as belonging to a lower caste than himself. Such scenes are produced for their entertainment potential and seldom offer much enlightenment, as was the case here. Michael, the seventh Earl of Onslow, is an hereditary peer and therefore, by definition, “upper class”, but privilege has not raised him to anything like the heights in politics that Prescott has scaled, and he is not even the owner of Clandon Park, the great country house in Surrey at which he entertained the Prescotts. It belongs to the National Trust. The Hay-on-Wye literary festival, where Prescott was brought face to face with purportedly “middle-class” intellectuals, is attended by a mostly elderly, bookish crowd who are probably much poorer than him and would not appear to deserve the guillotine. The young men at the Henley Regatta whom he also met were of equally uncertain social origin.
No, the programme was about an idea that exists in Prescott’s head that he has somehow, despite his impressive political ascent, been held back or kept down because of his background as a waiter on an ocean liner. And his class resentment seems to be mainly directed at Tony and Cherie Blair, who would never invite him and Pauline to state banquets. This is a series not about class at all, but about Prescott’s own peculiar view of the world. There is still room for a programme that would try to explain what class actually means today, if indeed it means anything at all.’
Of course, the real tragedy is that from now on, given the polarisation of the education system and the reduction of the influnece of the union’s education support systems, its unlikely that someone from John Prescott’s original background would consider political service worth the effort. I went to see Toni Morrison talking about her new book this week, and one of her interesting points that ‘we’ always know more about ‘them’ than do about ‘us’. [See also the The Likes of Us by Micheal Collins]
November 1, 2008 at 9:22 am
adifferentvoice
Hi Tricia, and thanks for posting that excerpt from The Guardian. Tell your Yorkshire Man that the Intrepid Explorer had the good fortune to be at the game!
As for your former boss … is he in denial, ignorant, or blind? Either he’s never encountered the class system because he’s securely in the upper middle class, or he refuses to see the truth because it is too painful to contemplate. You need a spare £40,000 (pre-tax) a year to buy one child’s way out, beyond the reach of civil servants. Some public schools are rushing to increase the bursaries they offered, scared that their charitable status might be withdrawn, but the worry is that the bursaries might be directed at those members of the upper middle class who have fallen on hard times and cannot afford the annual membership fee any more. We sometimes wonder why such families crucify themselves financially, and call in every family favour, to ensure that their children remain in the private system, and then we watch a programme like this one, and the light goes on. It’s a question of (social) death or survival.
November 1, 2008 at 1:45 pm
Stavros
I was always under the impression that the class system was dying in Britain, it appears sadly that it is alive and well. I am curious, do private schools give scholarships to indigent students whose parents can’t cough up the tuition but have academic promise?
November 1, 2008 at 5:03 pm
Tricia
My old boss is securely in the upper classes. He does though recognise that Prescott has been successful – more succesful than the Earl of Onslow, since presumbably in the past it would have been a given for the Earl to get a top govt job.
It is well known that it is the middle classes who benefit most from such opportunities – even from the welfare state. As you’ve said, they are buying the networks, the confidence, as well as the scholarship, dedication and inspiration. Like you I am at a loss as to why we cannot have this in all schools, and it is disappointing to see it disappearing in adult learning centres around the UK too – so even the second chances are being lost to people who come to things a bit later.
November 1, 2008 at 6:42 pm
adifferentvoice
We must unite and do something!!!
Talking about Prescott and success though, there was a part of the programme which made uncomfortable watching, when Prescott was asked whether he had basically been used by Blair’s New Labour to present an acceptable face to the traditional membership of the party. Horrible thought.
November 3, 2008 at 8:21 pm
Anni
This is so sad. I’ve recently moved to the UK, and I do see the class system, like how those called chavs are reviled even among people should know better. I know there are many bad apples but it makes me sad. I always try to judge people on how they are not what they appear to be instead of being mocking and contemptous from the beginning.
On another note, this is exactly like racism when non-white people state that it exists, many white people shout them down and say it doesn’t. Maybe they aren’t just fantasising?
November 4, 2008 at 10:18 am
adifferentvoice
Anni, thank you for commenting. Do please carry on!
My take on racism is that it exists in all cultures, all ethnicities and it is not fair to dump it only on white people. What makes the racism of white people so much worse in most developed countries is that it is accompanied by the power of the majority. I think majority power brings with it a responsibility to ensure that the minority are not disempowered.
The class system in Britain becomes a more serious problem if the snobbery of higher classes is attached to power – which probably explains John Prescott’s devotion to Trades Unions and why he is obsessed by the unfairness of the privately educated 7.5% of the population occupying 80% of the top jobs (to use his favourite statistic).